Criterion I

• 1.1.1 – Effective curriculum delivery (well planned and documented process)
• 1.1.2 – Academic calendar including conduct of (CIE)
• 1.4.1 – Feedback on the syllabus and its transaction (Students / Teachers / Employers / Alumni)
• 1.4.2 – Feedback process

Criterion II

• 2.2.1 – Special Programmes for advanced learners and slow learners
• 2.3.1 – Student centric methods (Experiential learning / Participative learning / Problem solving methodologies)
• 2.3.2 – Teachers use ICT enabled tools for effective teaching-learning process
• 2.5.1 – Mechanism of internal assessment (transparent / robust and frequency / mode)
• 2.5.2 – Mechanism to deal with internal examination grievances (transparent / time bound / efficient)
• 2.6.1 – Programme and course outcomes for all Programmes
• 2.6.2 – Attainment of Programme outcomes and course outcomes
• 2.6.3.1 – Total number of final year students passed university examination
• 2.7.1 – Student Satisfaction Survey (SSS) on overall institutional performance

Criterion III

• 3.2.1 – Institution has created an ecosystem for innovations (creation and transfer of knowledge)
• 3.3.1 – Number of Ph.D's registered
• 3.4.1 – Extension activities (neighborhood community)

Criterion IV

• 4.1.1 – Adequate infrastructure and physical facilities
• 4.1.2 – Adequate facilities for cultural activities, sports, games, gymnasium, yoga centre etc.
• 4.1.3 – Number of classrooms and seminar halls with ICT- enabled facilities
• 4.2.1 – Library is automated using Integrated Library Management System
• 4.3.1 – Institution frequently updates its IT facilities including Wi-Fi
• 4.4.2 – Established systems and procedures for maintaining and utilizing physical, academic and support facilities
• 5.1.3 – Capacity building and skills enhancement initiatives
• 5.3.2 – Students’ representation and engagement in various administrative, co-curricular and extracurricular activities

Criterion V

• 5.4.1 – Registered Alumni Association contributes (financial and/or other support services)

Criterion VI

• 6.1.1 – The governance (vision and mission)
• 6.1.2 – Effective leadership (decentralization and participative management)
• 6.2.1 – The institutional Strategic/ perspective plan is effectively deployed
• 6.2.2 – The functioning of the institutional bodies (effective and efficient)
• 6.3.1 – Effective welfare measures for teaching and non- teaching staff
• 6.3.5 – Performance Appraisal System for teaching and non- teaching staff
• 6.4.1 – Internal and external financial audits
• 6.4.3 – Institutional strategies for mobilization of funds and optimal utilization of resources
• 6.5.1 – Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly
• 6.5.2 – Reviews of teaching learning process, structures and methodologies
• 6.5.3 – Quality assurance initiatives of the institution

Criterion VII

• 7.1.1 Annual gender sensitization action plan
• 7.2.1 – Two best practices successfully implemented
• 7.3.1 – Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust